Initial Subjective Load Carriage Injury Data Collected with Interviews and Questionnaires
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Mining for Analysis of Interviews and Questionnaires
Interviews and questionnaires are the basis for collecting information about the opinions, concerns and needs of people. Analysis of those texts is crucial to understand the kansei of people. Text mining is an approach to discover useful and interesting patterns, knowledge and information from texts. This chapter contains two sections on text mining for beginners of it. The first section gives ...
متن کاملSubjective perceptions of load carriage on the head and back in Xhosa women.
The purpose of this study was to compare the subjective perceptual responses to both head-loading and back-loading in a group of Xhosa women. Thirty two women were divided into three groups based on their experience of head-loading and walked on a treadmill on two occasions, head-loading and back-loading, at a self selected walking speed for 4 min with a variety of loads until pain or discomfor...
متن کاملInteractive In-Situ Requirements Gathering: Extending Beyond Questionnaires and Interviews
Developing a usable tourist information system necessitate the gathering of requirements from tourists and visitors in situ. Traditional methods alone are argued as not sufficient for such needs. Thus, Wizard-of-Oz tests conducted with tourists in the intended environment of use are proposed as a complementary requirements gathering method.
متن کاملLoad carriage and the female soldier
There are obvious differences between men and women, differences which are taken into consideration when training athletes. Numerous texts discuss the genderspecific requirements of the female athlete, from coaching styles1 and training methods1, to dealing with social pressures2 and the impact of factors that selectively affect the female athlete3,4. On this basis, when it comes to athletic en...
متن کاملA comparison of think-aloud, questionnaires and interviews for testing usability with children
The paper reports a comparative assessment of 3 usability-testing methods (UTM) involving 45 children aged 8-14 as test-users. The 3 methods were concurrent think-aloud, interview and questionnaire. These 3 UTM ’s require different levels of verbalisation from the children that were performing the evaluation. It was hypothesised that the age of the children, their gender, verbal competence and ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Military Medicine
سال: 2007
ISSN: 0026-4075,1930-613X
DOI: 10.7205/milmed.172.3.306